|















|
Rents Soar In Wake of Decontrol
40 percent of units affected
Hannah Heineman Mirror staff writer
The Costa-Hawkins Act (vacancy decontrol) has caused the rents of 40
percent of the rent-controlled units in the City to escalate
dramatically.
This act went into effect January 1, 1999 and permitted owners to
raise rents on most rent controlled units to the market rate when they
were vacated.
A report measuring the effects of “Market Rate Vacancy Increases” from
1999 to 2003 was released by the City’s Rent Control Board in March.
It found that the Maximum Allowable Rents (MARS) for the re-rental of
controlled units has increased by as much as 82 percent.
Since 1999, MARS for studio units have gone from $626 to $924, up 48
percent while rents for one-bedroom units have gone from $708 to
$1,231, a 74 percent hike. Rent on two-bedroom units has gone from
$909 to $1,641, an 81 percent increase, and for apartments with three
or more bedrooms it has gone from $1,157 to $2,109, which is an 82
percent increase.
According to the report, “depending on the number of bedrooms in a
unit, the household income needed to ‘afford’ the median market rate
at 30 percent of gross income ranges from $52,800 to $77,751. This is
$17,000 to $35,000 higher than the income needed to afford the median
rent of the same size unit not rented at market rate. HUD
affordability standards assume 30 percent of a household’s gross
income may be used for rent before the household becomes ‘rent
burdened.”
According to the report, “The 10,929 units impacted by market rate
increases had a mixture of rents affordable to families at all income
levels before the increases were implemented.
Before the increases, 43 percent of the units had median rent levels
affordable to very-low income households. After the increases, less
than 2percent of the units remained affordable to these households.
This represents a loss of affordability of 4,547 units. Also before
the increases, 79 percent of the units had median rent levels
affordable to low income households. After the increases, only 9
percent of the units remained affordable at this income level.
Forty-five percent of market rents are affordable only to people
making more than 120 percent of the median income for a family of four
($66,120).”
Vacancy decontrol has also resulted in a “more mobile renter
population.” The report states that, “after five years of vacancy
decontrol, 42 percent of the units rented at market rate have turned
over at least once since the first market rate rental. Of the 10,929
units rented at market rate, 27 percent (2,967) have experienced two
vacancy increases, 10 percent (1,096) have had 3, and 5 percent (750)
have had 4 or more increases.”
Another factor that has affected the number of available rent control
units in the City is the 1986 Ellis Act. which allows landlords to go
out of rental business, evict tenants, and withdraw units from the
housing market.
A Rent Control Board August, 2003 report on “The Impact of the Ellis
Act” noted “that 309 properties (1,467 units) had been withdrawn under
the Ellis Act” as of June 30, 2003. This year Ellis Act withdrawals
have slowed “due in part to a change in state law (effective January
2003) that provides if withdrawn units are again offered for rent
within five years, the units must be rented at the rent that was in
effect when the units were taken off the market.” In addition, “rental
units withdrawn under the Ellis Act have, in large part, been replaced
by market rate condominiums and rental units not affordable to low or
moderate income households. This activity accelerated beginning in
1998 due to a combination of factors including improved market
conditions and city ordinances conducive to residential development.” |
|