|
[side_bar.asp]
|
Books In The MirrorWhat Lies
Beneath
Nothing Meets The Eye: The Uncollected Stories of Patricia
Highsmith
Patricia Highsmith
Norton
By Ed Siegel
2002 The Boston Globe
Long before Patricia Highsmith was an unappreciated writer she was
an unpublished one. W.W. Norton has begun publishing the
out-of-print work of crime fiction’s most lethal existentialist,
following the film version of The Talented Mr. Ripley, and now has
taken the even more valuable step of bringing out her unpublished and
uncollected work in the aptly named Nothing That Meets the Eye, a
fascinating compendium of work full of surprises even to her most
devoted fans.
Chief among them is that before Strangers on a Train was published
in 1950 and she became temporarily typecast, or miscast, as a crime
writer, Highsmith had quite a tender side. Unlike in the two most
recent paperbacks released by Norton, Little Tales of Misogyny and A
Dog’s Ransom, not every person you meet along the way is a potential
psycho killer. Some of the stories evoke more tenderness than terror.
But let’s not get carried away. If the Highsmith of the 1940s isn’t
as jaded as the Highsmith of the 1980s, the streets running through
her small towns and big cities are always capable of being plenty
mean. Any of these stories can end tragically, even if most of them
aren’t as violent as the stories and novels more familiar to the
general public.
In the first story, The Mightiest Morning, a candidate for the best
piece, a New Yorker leaves the city convinced that nirvana lies in a
small town he discovers, but is it “an unspoiled paradise” or a hotbed
of narrow-mindedness and bigotry? Highsmith might only have been 25 at
the time (1946), but her worldview was already sharp and
sophisticated, where “the eternal potential and the eternal nothing”
become one. Tender perhaps, sentimental never.
Even at their happiest, Highsmith’s characters are, like Camus’s,
“terribly alone” in a pitiless universe. It’s their strivings against
those forces that make them such interesting characters and Highsmith
such a fascinating writer.
Mildred’s attempts to make her sister’s visit to New York happy in
“Where the Door Is Always Open and the Welcome Mat Is Out,” Lucien’s
love of art forgeries in “The Great Cardhouse” (“It had become a
contest of faith vs. nonfaith”), Mr. McKenny’s attempt to eke out an
existence buying and selling parakeets in “A Bird in Hand” - each in
his or her own way is desperately looking for significance in the
smallest details of otherwise insignificant lives.
Which isn’t as nihilistic as it sounds. Highsmith doesn’t make the
stories palatable with doses of black humor, but she doesn’t often go
to the opposite extreme either, of erecting Sartre-like “no exit”
signs. It is the matter-of-factness of her writing that is
intoxicating, even liberating.
For Highsmith, people are capable of heroism only when they can
turn their back on the absolutists (“But didn’t you know that nothing
is absolute?” asks a pianist who hates the piano in “The Great
Cardhouse.” “Why, even my kitten knows that much.”
Highsmith’s tone is remarkably consistent over the 44 years covered
here, although there is one brilliant, somewhat experimental story,
1947’s “The Still Point of the Turning World,” in which she quick-cuts
cinematically from one character to another. The story itself makes a
series of trips to a public park by a well-off woman and her son a sly
delineation of class and sexuality, as if even this baby step out of
one’s role threatened chaos. Or as a character asks herself in another
story, “Doorbell for Louisa,” “Once a person has become detached from
his possessions, his customary duties, his moments of solitude, where
is he? What is he?”
In the earlier stories, such insights can lead to good things
happening to good people. As the years go on and Highsmith becomes
more jaded, there is a tendency to rely too much on suicide as the
only way out of life’s miseries, and when the corpses mount up the
effect can seem hollow.
Still, those same dread-filled instincts also lead to such
wonderfully wrought passages as this description of Muzak: “such
sick-making music had been coming from the ceiling of the elevator,
dulcet strains of violins, calculated to soothe, maybe, but which
hadn’t soothed, any more than it would have soothed the mind of a man
walking to an execution chamber, music that any fool knew was being
played to smooth over something, or to conceal something so horrible
that the human mind could not face it.”
Even more problematic than the sociopaths like the above
protagonist are those living on illusions. When illusions are burst in
Highsmith’s universe there is hell to pay, particularly in the later
stories, like “A Girl Like Phyl” or “Things Had Gone Badly.” In the
latter story, a man kills his wife because she becomes too nice and
because, ironically, he couldn’t imagine hurting her.
The real irony, though, is why Highsmith’s stories are so oddly
comforting. Perhaps because like many artists — Dostoevsky, Beckett —
Highsmith gives voice to those anxieties that we try so hard not to
let bubble up to the surface. Her notes from the underground across
almost a half century covered in Nothing That Meets the Eye
simultaneously make the subconscious smile and the skin crawl. |
|