|














|
Point of ViewLight Rail: The
Need Is Great, The Time Is Now
Kenneth S. Alpern, M.D.
Special to the Mirror
Southern California has an appeal to the rest of the nation, if not
the rest of the world, as a wonderful place to live with excellent
weather and innumerable tourist destinations. This appeal has led to
unprecedented population growth and density that has given Southern
California, especially Los Angeles County, the dubious distinction of
being #1 in pollution and traffic congestion.
The 10 freeway is the most congested in the nation (with the 405
freeway not too far behind), and the 405/101 freeway interchange is
the most congested in the nation as well.
California also has the interesting characteristic of being a
“donor” state to the rest of the nation. Only 88% of all federal taxes
paid by Californians come back to California to meet its needs for
health, education, transportation, etc. This “donor” status, of
course, occurs because the California Congressional Delegation has
been notoriously disorganized and without unity for years.
Enter the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21),
which, in a nutshell, authorizes a budget of federal taxpayer dollars
that can be used for transit and highway systems throughout the
nation. This budget of roughly $200 billion is redrawn every six years
during a renewal period that will occur again in 2003.
Make no bones about it: the fight for the final 2003
reauthorization will occur this year, and it will be big. Every state
is fighting for its “fair share” and more, and this year there will be
a great deal of debate and horse-trading in Washington as jockeying
for this large pot of money occurs in earnest.
Some key facts:
1) The Blue Line is undergoing an upgrading from two to three car
trains because of overwhelming popular demand, and, when completed, it
will potentially accommodate 90,000-100,000 riders daily, to become
the most heavily-travelled light rail in the nation.
2) The Red Line, upon connecting with the Valley via the North
Hollywood and Universal City stations, had its ridership double
overnight to roughly 120,000 riders daily, making it one of the
busiest subways in the nation
3) Even the Green Line, which “goes from nowhere to nowhere,” (from
Redondo Beach to Norwalk along the 105 freeway), accommodates over
30,000 riders daily—and when the Gold Line connecting Downtown Los
Angeles to Pasadena opens next year, the potential of another 60,000
riders using mass transit each day is quite likely
4)Metrolink trains, which carry commuters from neighboring counties
into and out of Los Angeles County, are filled to capacity as rapidly
as they are being built
In other words, despite the car culture that is so engrained in
California, if “you build mass transit they will come.” Most
Westsiders do not know about the success of Southern California mass
transit because they have absolutely no access to it, though our tax
dollars have been used to fund it.
As an active member of Friends4Expo, I am proud that we fought the
good fight last year to convince the MTA to authorize the construction
of the Exposition Light Rail Line (aka the Expo Line), which, when
completed, will connect Downtown Los Angeles with the Santa Monica
Pier—and will parallel and offer an alternative to the busy 10
freeway.
Some $200 million in federal money that was devoted previously to
the now-defunct Red Line extension to the Westside has been shifted by
the MTA towards the Expo Line—which is currently the main focus of
Westside mass transit. However, members of Congress from other states
view this particular money as potentially up for grabs.
Because of funding limitations, only a Phase I of Expo – which would
stop at East Culver City — has been approved. There was some question
of the best route through West Los Angeles to Santa Monica, but such a
question can be answered via the same public input that led to the
Phase I routing. With the Santa Monica City Council recently approving
a downtown renewal policy that would accommodate this Expo Line, it
should be emphasized that Phase II to Santa Monica could be pursued in
the immediate future if funding is achieved.
Currently, the MTA is also debating how to proceed with connecting
the Green Line to LAX — with money being the key element stopping such
a long-overdue connection from being initiated. Los Angeles Mayor
James Hahn is likely to push for a remote passenger terminal near
Parking Lots B and C, which would be a tantalizingly attractive target
for the Green Line to connect with LAX.
Westside cities have formed a Lincoln Corridor Task Force to
explore ways to mitigate traffic on Lincoln Boulevard. One proposed
solution is to have a light rail line that could run all the way down
to LAX and connect with the Green Line.
As this TEA-21 reauthorization fight goes on in Washington, it
behooves us as concerned citizens who suffer from worse air pollution
and traffic congestion than anywhere else in the nation to support our
Congressional delegation as they fight for Westside mass transit.
Some more facts:
1) The Westside will not get more freeways or Red Line access
anytime soon, so mass transit will be restricted to either buses or
light rail. The latter is cleaner, less noisy and a less bumpy ride,
has higher passenger capacity, and is much more likely to encourage
commuters to avoid using their cars than buses ever will
2) Regardless of the controversies over Playa Vista and LAX
expansion, Westside population and freeway congestion is worsening,
and future LAX expansion (which I personally oppose) can be avoided by
connecting LAX with other airports via elements such as the Green Line
3) Rep. Henry Waxman, who halted the Red Line due to environmental
concerns and who is fighting the oil/energy culture that led to Enron,
has a constituency that would benefit more than any other from a
completed Expo Line
4) Rep. Jane Harman, who has fought LAX expansion and who favors
Green Line connection to LAX as part of a regional air traffic
alternative for Southern California, is being redistricted towards the
Westside and has a constituency that will benefit from both Expo and
Green Line construction
5) Rep. Maxine Waters, who has also fought LAX expansion, has a
constituency in neighboring Inglewood and Westchester that would
benefit from the pollution- and congestion-mitigating effects that
would result from Green Line connection to LAX (and beyond someday to
the Westside?)
6) Senators Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein are both from
Northern California and are much more familiar with its transit needs
— and have viewed previous NIMBYism towards mass transit with some
concern as to whether Southern California is as pro-mass transit as
its neighbors to the
north.
Proposition 42, which will devote the gasoline sales tax towards
highways and transit construction was recently overwhelmingly passed
by predominantly conservative statewide electorate in March. In other
words, Californians understand the need for traffic relief. Whether
one is a liberal environmentalist, a conservative who wants California
tax dollars to return to our state, or merely someone who wants a
better quality of life for Southern California, transportation is a
non-partisan issue that should appeal to all of us—and our
Congressional delegation needs your letter-writing support as they
fight for our future.
As a proud member of the organizing committee of the Mar Vista
Community (Neighborhood) Council, I want to announce the Intermodal
Transit Forum to be held Tuesday evening on April 9 (see related
story, page 1.)
As a physician, I want cleaner air for Southern California. As a
taxpayer, I want my fair share from the government I subsidize. As a
Southern California resident, I want relief from worsening freeway
congestion. Most importantly, as the father of an amazingly sweet and
beautiful 18-month-old baby boy, I want a better future for my son.
Kenneth S. Alpern, M.D, is a member of the Organizing Committee,
Mar Vista Community Council Steering Committees, Friends4Expo and
Friends of the Green Line. |
|