|












|
Reflections & Observations
Flawed Plan,
Flawed Process
Under Santa Monica City Council rules, when a Council
member has a stake -– however slight or indirect –- in a matter, which
comes before the Council, the member dutifully withdraws from the dais
until the matter has been resolved.
On Tuesday, February 5, the Council is scheduled to discuss and
vote on whether to proceed with the Civic Center Specific Plan. The
Plan was developed by the Civic Center Working Group, which was
created by the Council. As it happens, three of its members are also
members of the Council – Richard Bloom, Ken Genser and Mayor Pro Tem
Kevin McKeown.
Clearly, Bloom, Genser and McKeown can be said to have a stake in
the plan – not a financial stake (which is generally the basis for
conflicts of interest), but a political and/or personal stake. Not
only have they spent some political capital on the proposed plan, they
have invested their brains and, yes, egos in it. To an extent, the
success or failure of the plan as well as the public reaction to the
plan will accrue to them. If it’s a winner, acclaimed by the public,
they’re winners. Likewise, if it’s a flop, scorned by the public, they
are flops.
But when the plan comes before the Council, not only will Bloom,
Genser and McKeown remain on the dais, as far as we know, they will
participate in the discussion and vote on it. It’s rather like lawyer
making his or her case in court and then donning a judge’s robes and
making a ruling on the case.
Since they took part in making the plan, Bloom, Genser and McKeown
must favor it, and they only need one of the other four Council
members’ votes to approve the plan and move it to the next stage.
In this way, the City’s much-vaunted public process has been
highjacked — with the public relegated to the sidelines as the Council
dances with itself off into the sunset – with the Civic Center plan in
its pocket.
As we have said previously, and at length, we think the plan is
fatally flawed, and, sadly, the process, in this instance, is as
flawed as the plan. |
|