Does Dianne Feinstein Remark Imply Big Senate Races Ahead?

Saturday, 1 Feb 2014, 10:17:00 AM

Tom Elias

Thomas B. Elias, Columnist
Santa Monica Mirror Archives
Thomas B. Elias, Columnist

No doubt the California Republican Party is down, but anyone who

counts it out of big statewide races is a fool who disregards the

ego-satisfying appeal prominent public office can hold for the very rich and

very famous.

Arnold Schwarzenegger is Example A of a fabulously wealthy

celebrity who seized an opportunity to run for high office – governor – and

then had more fun while holding the office than he appears to have had as a

muscleman movie star before or since.

This is relevant today not because there appear to be few or no

immediate high-visibility opportunities today for celebrities or business

people with big bucks. California offers no U.S. Senate races this year and

Gov. Jerry Brown looks pretty secure as he piles up campaign cash while

delaying any direct mention of reelection.

But one remark last month by U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein suggests

there may be plenty of chances ahead. Explaining her vote to end the U.S.

Senate’s tradition of allowing minority parties to use filibusters to stymie

presidential appointments, she said she did it because she wants “the remainder

of my five-plus years to get something done.” As of now, she has just four-plus

years left in her latest term.

The reality is that Feinstein will turn 80 on June 22 and would be

84 in June of 2018, the next year she might run for reelection, 85 just six

months into what would be her fifth full six-year term, plus. (First elected in

1992 to fill out the unexpired term of then-Gov. Pete Wilson, a Republican, she

then had to run again in 1994 for a full term). That’s not terribly ancient for

the Senate, but it would make her the oldest top-of-ticket candidate in

California history.

Did her remark mean she thinks about leaving office when her

current term expires, even if she remains in good health? There is, of course,

nothing political wonks love more than finding meaning in officials’ words,

even where there may be little.

Longtime Feinstein campaign manager Bill Carrick says his friend

and client was talking only about her current term. “She hasn’t made any

decisions about 2018 yet,” Carrick said. “So I wouldn’t read too much into a

casual remark.”

He noted that even now, four years before her campaign could begin

in earnest, Feinstein has more than $1 million in her political kitty, while

still pursuing a lawsuit against a bank she contends allowed a former campaign

treasurer to embezzle another $4 million or so from her in 2012. The theft

didn’t matter much: Feinstein won handily that year over a virtual unknown,

taking more than 7.75 million votes, the most ever for any senator.

Still…her remark might stir the cadre of ambitious Democratic

politicians now waiting patiently for a big chance while holding lesser

statewide offices – people like Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, Attorney General Kamala

Harris and Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones. For there’s the possibility of a

plum job appearing on the horizon.

There’s also the Senate seat of Democrat Barbara Boxer, 73. The

former Marin County supervisor and congresswoman spurred talk of impending

retirement when she moved to Rancho Mirage in Riverside County’s Coachella

Valley even before she sought reelection in 2010.

Unlike Feinstein, who has had a series of weak opponents, Boxer is

perpetually deemed among the Senate’s more vulnerable Democrats and has drawn

significant opponents like Bill Jones, then the California Secretary of State,

and the partially self-funded former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina.

Since first winning her Senate seat in 1992, Boxer has used long

series of coffee parties in individual homes as a key part of her campaigns,

which have usually seemed far more arduous than Feinstein’s. Boxer will be 75

if she runs two years from now, and should she choose to bow out, that’s a

possible big opening for the wealthy and ambitious.

But Boxer in 2010 foiled those who thought she might step down and

has been more visible than ever in her current term.

All of which means there may be two big political openings forming

on the California horizon – or there may not. We’ll all have to stay tuned as

two redoubtable women decide how long they want to continue fighting for

women’s rights, abortion rights and on other key issues they’ve made their own.

Copyright © 2011 by Santa Monica Mirror. All rights reserved.