Court's Hit At Governor Jerry Brown Actually Helps Him

Saturday, 27 Apr 2013, 8:47:00 AM

Tom Elias

Thomas B. Elias, Columnist
Santa Monica Mirror Archives
Thomas B. Elias, Columnist

Normally, it's uncomfortable at best to hear a federal judge -- let alone

a panel of three such jurists -- thunder criticism atone from the

bench.

But as usual, Gov. Jerry Brown is different. For beyond doubt, prison

realignment has drawn more criticism than any other single thing he has done in

his second incarnation as governor, even more than his devotion to high speed

rail. But the judges' tirade now provides Brown a convenient scapegoat, one on

which he can pin blame for the entire prisoner-release program, and with

complete accuracy.

That, of course, wasn’t the way the three-man judicial panel intended

things to go when making bald threats against the governor if he doesn’t release

even more convicts.

“At no point over the past several months have defendants indicated any

willingness to comply, or made any attempt to comply, with the orders of this

court,” said the panel, referring to Brown and his administration. “In fact,

they have blatantly defied (court orders).”

The three jurists – district judges Lawrence Karlton and Thelton

Henderson and Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Steven Reinhardt – gave Brown

21 days to submit a plan for meeting their prison population target by the end

of this year. If Brown doesn’t simultaneously begin complying with the court

order, the judges said, he risks being cited for contempt. So the governor said

he would ready a plan to release 10,000 more prisoners in case his appeals

fail.

Imagine a California governor sitting in the basement lockup of a federal

courthouse eating cheese sandwiches. Theoretically, at least, it could happen,

if the judges aren’t satisfied with Brown’s response.

The court’s latest order stems from the fact that even after Brown’s

controversial realignment program reduced convict numbers by about 20,000 over

the last 18 months, state prisons are remain filled to 149 percent of their

designed capacity. The judges say this overcrowding constitutes cruel and

unusual punishment, and prior, similar rulings have been upheld by the U.S.

Supreme Court.

Meanwhile, Brown looks around the state and sees cities cutting police

forces to balance budgets, well-to-do neighborhoods hiring private security to

compensate, a 65 percent rise in warrants issued for paroled sex offenders

supposedly tracked by GPS devices who have gone missing and a few felons turning

violent after being convicted of non-violent offenses and then paroled under

realignment.

Possibly the most significant of the latter type of case was the early

April fatal stabbing of a woman in a Fontana park-and-ride lot. California

Highway Patrol officers later shot and killed the alleged murderer, David

Mulder, a 43-year-old transient with a history of drug offenses released from

state prison a few months earlier under realignment.

Mulder, like many others, had been transferred to the supervision of

county probation officers.

Complained Fontana Police Chief Rod Jones to reporters after that

incident and another where a felon released to county supervision alleged raped

a woman in a hotel room, “Dangerous prisoners that belong in state prison

continue to be released early.”

These and other cases caused Brown’s conservative critics to rip him,

even suggesting he be indicted for assisting those crimes.

But the entire realignment program was a response to federal court orders

– upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court – to reduce prison crowding and improve

prison medical care. Brown’s first two budgets in his current term provided

money for local agencies to supervise the supposedly low-level, non-violent

criminals involved.

The problem, of course, is that there’s always a risk of a previously

non-violent offender turning to more serious crime. Car thieves occasionally

become arsonists, burning vehicles and whatever is near where they’re parked.

Some drug addicts become armed robbers, rapists or killers. This happens even

without realignment, but draws much more focus when prisoners are being released

early and some go missing either because local parole officers are overloaded or

tracking devices fail or are removed.

Brown said little about those cases, except that they’ve been rare

exceptions under his program, which is correct.

Now he won’t have to be very defensive any more. For by resisting the

latest court order, even to the point of approaching a constitutional crisis, he

can argue that whatever he’s done has not been of his own volition and was

designed to minimize risk.

In a state with a long tradition of voting for tough-sounding

law-and-order candidates and ballot propositions, the judges’ threatening

language has inoculated Brown against most soft-on-crime charges that might be

leveled against him during his anticipated 2014 reelection

campaign.

Copyright © 2011 by Santa Monica Mirror. All rights reserved.