If Santa Monica hopes to be taken seriously for its goals
to reduce greenhouse emissions, then it may behoove City Hall to ensure all
future developments are at least making an effort to comply with the spirit of
the Climate Action Plan.
One possible requirement of future multi-use
developments: install photovoltaic (PV), or solar, panels on rooftops.
Council member Ted Winterer and Mayor Pro Tem Terry O’Day
asked staff on Tuesday night to include in development agreement (DA)
negotiations a request that the project produce “the greatest amount of
photovoltaic panels feasible given the rooftop configuration and orientation of
The request was unanimously approved.
Winterer said the possible addition of PV cells to
multi-use developments benefits the community by helping reduce greenhouse
“When we had our hearing on Climate Action Plan the other
day it became very clear to me that we really need to start thinking about how
we can achieve those goals in every aspect of government that we oversee,”
Winterer said. “It struck me both at our most recent hearing on a development
agreement and watching the most recent one at the Planning Commission that, in
both cases … no one knew exactly how much electricity they’d be generating (by
solar panels attached to the project).
Winterer said now was the time to get busy about dealing
with climate change.
“There are a lot of development agreements in front of us
and this is our chance to gain the maximum amount of PV possible out of those
agreements,” he said.
City Manager Rod Gould said the intent of this potential
policy is to ultimately have multi-use developments generate their own power.
Mayor Pam O’Connor said she supported the concept but
pondered whether City Hall was on the verge of requesting so many community
benefits from developers that they no longer find value building in Santa
Winterer countered that requiring more PV cells could
actually be a project benefit.
He added he learned at a workshop that for every $1
invested into green features for a single-family residence, an additional $20
would be added to the property value.
He suspected a similar return on investment would exist
for mixed-used developments, as well.
“It’s a capital investment that’d take a long time to pay
off but I think for a lot of applicants if they really look at it, they’d
realize they’d be reducing their operational costs and increasing the
marketability of the rental space. They are generating a lot of their
electrical needs,” Winterer said. “Energy costs have nowhere to go but up, so
in the long term this is probably a good idea for (the developer).”
Council members agreed the request for solar panels
should not be an arbitrary and inflexible requirement but instead be determined
on a case-by-case basis. As the language of the request was phrased to allow
for flexibility, the concern of whether this would eventually lead to the
council seeking too many community benefits from developers was alleviated.
In addition to PV panels, the council also approved a
request to “negotiate more aggressive Average Vehicle Ridership,” or carpooling
targets, in DAs.
In a separate agenda item, council members unanimously
approved a modification of the recently adopted DA application review process
“to require separate Architectural Review Board and Planning Commission float
ups rather than one combined float up.”
Accordingly, DA applicants would first sit before the
Architectural Review Board before moving forward to the Planning Commission.
Copyright © 2011 by Santa Monica Mirror. All rights reserved.