Elections matter, one reason for the immigration reform proposals coming
from President Obama and a bipartisan panel of U.S. senators in recent
Here are a few facts behind
those moves: Republican Mitt Romney won among white voters, rich and poor, male
and female, by an overall 59-39 percent last November. Because Obama had far
larger margins among Latinos, blacks and Asian-Americans, Romney’s strong
showing among whites didn’t win him the presidency.
Meanwhile, voting by Latinos
is on an upswing in many currently safe GOP states like Texas
and Georgia, causing freshman Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas to observe that
unless the GOP does something to win them over, Texas will become Democratic
before another decade passes.
But that’s only part of the
picture. It turns out the strong anti-illegal immigrant feeling behind GOP
platforms, state and federal, for most of the last 20 years was on the wane long
before the fall election.
Before the spring of 2012,
legislative action in Arizona and Utah, two states whose governments are firmly
controlled by Republicans, saw an uninterrupted flow of precedent-setting moves
against illegal immigrants.
Police in Arizona now must stop anyone they so much as suspect of being
in this country illegally, and demand documents. All employers there are
required to use the national E-Verify system to determine whether any new hire
was undocumented. And more. The U.S. Supreme Court ratified that E-Verify
The results for Arizona have been decidedly mixed so far. The state lost
a few conventions to boycotts by liberal-leaning organizations. Thousands of
illegal immigrants moved to other states, including an estimated 20,000 coming
In Utah, where Republicans ousted two longtime GOP officeholders, Rep.
Chris Cannon and Sen. Robert Bennett, because they did not vote for anti-illegal
immigrant crackdowns, laws similar to Arizona’s had been moving through the
state Legislature. But that suddenly halted last spring. One reason: Utah business leaders
who usually back Republicans realized anti-illegal immigrant laws could hurt
The Salt Lake City Chamber of Commerce noted a sharp increase in
convention business after Arizona passed its stop-anyone-suspicious law. Hotels
and restaurants didn’t want to lose that new business via Utah becoming a clone
of its neighbor.
In Arizona, E-Verify caused many illegals to become independent
contractors rather than employees. A study by the Public Policy Institute of
California using U.S. Census numbers last spring put the number of new
independent contractors in Arizona at 25,000 since E-Verify took effect.
Businesses still hire illegals to wash cars and pick crops, but it’s off the
books to a much greater extent than earlier.
Then Arizona’s anti-illegal immigrant leaders, notably former state
Senate Republican leader Russell Pearce (author of the demand-documents law),
failed miserably when they tried to expand their state’s push against the
Pearce was recalled from office. Arizona’s Senate voted down one bill
aiming to make that state the leader in a national push to end birthright
citizenship, which makes any child born in America a U.S. citizen. The idea was
to have hospitals issue different birth certificates to children of illegals
than to other newborns. One reason it lost: The notion that many Latino illegals
come to America mainly to get citizenship for their babies has been largely
debunked by a Census finding that illegals who give birth in America have been
in this country, on average, well over three years.
Also defeated were bills banning illegals from state universities and
making it a crime for illegals to drive any vehicle in
Dozens of chief executives of Arizona companies including U.S. Airways,
hospitals and real estate developers, signed a letter calling for defeat of
those bills, with the Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce taking the lead.
About the same time, Utah adopted a state guest-worker bill much like
what many Democrats in Congress long have pushed, favoring amnesty for illegals
who have worked long periods in America. Utah now allows illegals who commit no
crimes and have held jobs for years to work within the state and get “driving
These moves came after the Salt Lake chamber and other organizations – in
a move endorsed by the Mormon Church of Latter Day Saints – called for
immigration laws to focus on families.
It was a far cry from the “illegal means illegal” approach taken earlier
So events in two very “red” Republican states signaled that the
anti-illegal immigrant tide was fading long before anything happened at the
national level. The fact that major Republicans are part of the new push for
allowing amnesty does not mean anti-illegal immigrant feeling has disappeared.
But it does indicate the wave has peaked and that GOP leaders know what they
must do to survive in a changing America.
Copyright © 2011 by Santa Monica Mirror. All rights reserved.