Email List

To join our e-mail list, please enter your e-mail address. You can unsubscribe at any time.






Dog frolicking on the beach.
Dog frolicking on the beach.

News, City Council, Environment, Beach, Santa Monica

Santa Monica Dog Beach Put On Leash

Posted Nov. 27, 2011, 12:47 am

Parimal M. Rohit / Staff Writer

Dreams of a dog freely running along the Santa Monica coastline with a trail of splashing water in its wake have been put on a leash by Sacramento.

With the State of California winning yet another round of arguments on the issue, Santa Monica’s hopes of realizing a dog beach have been stifled yet again, City Hall announced.

It is the second time within seven years that Sacramento basically showed Santa Monica the door, or, in this case, the ocean. Accordingly, the status quo remains and what patrons of Santa Monica State Beach will continue to see is an image free of unleashed dogs freely roaming one of the most popular stretches of ocean water meeting urban sand.

“State Parks remains opposed to permitting any off-leash areas on State beaches,” Santa Monica Community and Cultural Services Director Barbara Stinchfield wrote in a memo. “As a State agency, State Parks maintains a consistent policy for all State parklands and this applies to the current position of no off-leash dog beaches.”

Stating that City Hall has made every effort to work with Sacramento to allow a dog beach pilot program to move forward, Stinchfield added the State’s reluctance to move forward is, at least partially, economically motivated.

“In light of staff reductions and budget cuts at the State level, it was made clear that there was no chance for a pilot program to move forward at this time,” she said.

Beyond finances, environmental concerns were also mentioned as a reason why Santa Monica State Beach may not realize unleashed dogs roaming around for many years to come.

“The concerns remain the same as those stated during the previous attempt to establish a dog beach in 2005,” Stinchfield said. “The risk to threatened species, such as the snowy plover, and to sensitive ecosystems, the possible threat to the safety of visitors, wildlife, other dogs, interference or displacement of recreational users, and health issues related to dog feces and dog urine in the water and sand (were all cited as key worries for not allowing a dog beach).”

Sacramento was not the only one citing budgetary and environmental concerns in allowing a dog beach along Santa Monica’s coastline.

Doug Gold, Heal the Bay president, wrote on a blog the local sands cost millions of dollars in taxpayer money as is to maintain, and adding a dog beach would only make it more expensive. Gold said more than $2.5 million was recently expended on a Santa Monica Pier cleanup campaign.

Gold also pointed out that while Measure V has helped improve coastal conditions at Santa Monica Beach, the water quality struggles to consistently meet standards for fecal bacteria, an issue that could potentially be compounded by unleashed dogs.

Gold added he would not be surprised if the dog beach became a hot issue again soon, though he hoped the next iteration, whenever or whatever it may be, would feature some basic characteristics.

“Like vampires, dog beaches seem to keep coming back from the dead,” Gold wrote on his blog. “I just hope the next dog beach proposal is for a fenced enclosure far away from the shoreline, children or sensitive wildlife.”

This latest attempt to bring a dog beach to Santa Monica was introduced to council members on Oct. 25. Then, council members voted 6-1 to direct staff to return with a pilot program proposal for an off-leash area for dogs to roam around along the sand down to the waterline.

If established, the pilot program would allow for City Hall to monitor the beach and water for potential environmental effects. If results were favorable, City Hall could have potentially made a case for a longer termed dog beach.

Post a comment


Nov. 27, 2011, 1:56:57 pm

Adi Liberman said...

For the record, a dog beach was rejected for the Venice and Dockweiler beaches in the City of Los Angeles were rejected by the Los Angeles City Council for the same reaons. Also, Dr. Gold's first name is Mark, not Doug.

Nov. 29, 2011, 3:49:57 am

Water features Sacramento said...

Indeed a very nice post, I am also belong to Nature care and love to enjoy reading fresh post on this subject I would like to thank you for writing this post and now I am your regular reader as I have subscribed your blog in my RSS reader.

Nov. 27, 2011, 11:41:21 pm

Georja Umano said...

The state Dept. of Parks and Recreation's objections to a dog beach do not hold water when you look at the over 60 existing dog beaches in the state which are thriving with none of those predicted ill effects. The California Research Bureau made a 67 page research project of Concerns and Benefits of Dog Beaches. According to the state's own report, the existing dog beaches do not have these problems. Who is being disingenuous here?

Dec. 6, 2011, 2:37:33 pm

Stephen said...

Dear Santa I just want my Dog to Stop Paw Chewing

SM Mirror TV