Email List

To join our e-mail list, please enter your e-mail address. You can unsubscribe at any time.






Debra Fine, who was shot five times during the 2013 Santa Monica College shootings, spoke about gun violence outside SMC on Wednesday. She is flanked by Richard Martinez and Amar Kaleka.
Photo by Corina Mun
Debra Fine, who was shot five times during the 2013 Santa Monica College shootings, spoke about gun violence outside SMC on Wednesday. She is flanked by Richard Martinez and Amar Kaleka.

News, Health, Santa Monica College, Santa Monica

Santa Monica College Shooting Victim Advocates For Better Gun Responsibility

Posted Aug. 1, 2014, 8:51 am

Corina Mun / Staff Writer

With the tragically rising frequency with which mass public shootings have occurred throughout recent years, including the tragic Santa Monica College shootings last June, the issue of gun responsibility has inevitably been put in the political spotlight as a response to such heinous crime.

On Wednesday, four notable speakers, all either survivors or family members of survivors of mass shootings, spoke at a press conference across the street from Santa Monica College.

Debra Fine, a survivor of the 2013 Santa Monica College shootings, shared her story and discussed her current endeavors regarding effective approaches to gun violence.

In addition to fine, the speakers were Wisconsin congressional candidate Amar Kaleka, son of 2012 Wisconsin Sikh Temple shooting victim; Richard Martinez, father of 2014 Santa Barbara shooting victim Christopher Michaels-Martinez; and Patricia Maisch, survivor of the 2011 Tucson, Arizona shooting.

It has been just over a year since the devastating shootings at Santa Monica College, but Fine made sure to emphasize the fact that from her heart, she will always remember the victims and their families and loved ones.

As a survivor who was shot five times during the Santa Monica College shootings, Fine has courageously been able to channel her traumatic experience to become a victims advocate and work toward improvement in the current infrastructure of gun control in the United States.

“I’ve become very, very proactive,” Fine said. “My husband and I started Fineline Foundation, which offers resources – physical, mental, financial – for victims of violent crimes.”

The controversy behind gun responsibility lies in the fact that not only are there victims in front of the gun, there is also a victim of mental illness behind the gun.

“On the other end, I joined the board of the Maple [Counseling] Center,” Fine said. “[The Center] offers free or very low-cost treatment for people with mental illness.”

To further be able to detect any issues and eliminate their roots, Fine has become involved with the “I Have A Dream” Foundation, which works with at-risk youth at an early age.

Fine has also written a book titled “Wake Up Call: From Trauma to Triumph” to engage victims and help them lead productive lives post-tragedy.

“I’m proud to be here,” Fine said. “[I want] to be of help in whatever way [I] can and in whatever way [my] Foundation can.”

Martinez, who has spoken through several media outlets to spread awareness about his son, is also taking wide measures to ensure that the topic of gun responsibility is addressed in the upcoming election’s ballots.

“We all have our part to end the gun violence crisis,” Martinez said. “Hold the politicians accountable [...] Make them protect our children.”

One of his ultimate goals is to organize one million voters by the next election in support of stricter laws on gun safety.

Congressional candidate Kaleka, who traveled to California from Wisconsin to speak at the press conference, holds the issue of gun responsibility “near and dear to [his] heart” as a family member of a victim.

Kaleka elaborated on his own three-step proposition to initiating more serious regulations on gun responsibility, including the implementation of universal background checks on gun sales, tougher laws on gun trafficking, and accidental discharge insurance on every gun.

Kaleka highlighted the seriousness of the gun violence crisis by explaining why he flew out to Santa Monica to attend the conference.

“The West Coast is one of the most progressive areas in the nation,” Kaleka said. “But gun violence has struck [here as well].”

Martinez and Kaleka explained that they are not against weapons of defense in and of themselves – as they are both gun owners – but feel the absolute essentiality of implementing stricter laws.

Though, according to Kaleka, about “80 percent of the nation believes in safe, common-sense solutions” regarding gun laws, zero significant measures have been passed in Washington. The purpose of this press conference was to create discussion through the testimonies and announcements of mass shooting survivors from various national shootings.

Earlier this year on the one-year anniversary, Fine spoke about she had been heading home from a singing lesson in Santa Monica on June 7, 2013. Taking an alternate route to get home, she found herself caught in the crossfire of the SMC shooting spree, leaving her shot a total of five times. As she drove along, she saw a man dressed in black, holding an automatic rifle.

“He motioned the girl in front of me who was in a car, to pull over, and she did,” Fine recalled. “Then, he pointed the gun at her and she looked very frightened.”

Fine stepped on the gas of her car, yelling at the shooter to stop.

He raised his rifle and fired at her, with the first bullet hitting her in her right shoulder, and additional shots hitting her four times on her left side. The shooting spree claimed the lives of five people, including the gunman, and wounded several others.

For more information on Debra Fine and the Fineline Foundation, visit and

Post a comment


Aug. 1, 2014, 10:50:05 am

Martin said...

Brave person. Admirable. Common sense? Indeed. Universal background checks: a pragmatic investigation of all the mass shootings will result in very few percentage of those individuals being denied guns directly or through whatever source they got from. Tougher laws on gun trafficking? Isn't it illegal to traffic in guns? Discharge insurance? great solace to lose someone to gun fire and just know that the gun is insured. How about stop trying to get rid of guns, but jail people who don't follow safe storage, and handling. Also encourage gun ownership, but must have courses in safe use and perhaps a license? Stop raising effeminate boys who get excited at the sight of a gun due to its prohibition. How about we work on decreasing the number of deaths from guns rather than getting rid of them. ? Hold parents responsible if they have guns laying around. Etc.

Aug. 1, 2014, 3:08:04 pm

Abraham Collins said...

The Isla Vista shooter passed background checks, used firearms that passed the "dangerous handgun" laws of California, used 10 round magazines and wasn't prohibited from owning guns based on his mental condition. What additional law would have prevented this massacre? "implementation of [...] accidental discharge insurance on every gun." Brazenly unconstitutional and st*pid. How would insurance bring these victims back from the dead? His guns weren't even fired accidentally; they were fired intentionally and the insurance adjuster wouldn't cover a claim anyway. A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.

Aug. 1, 2014, 4:41:48 pm

philip hendricks said...

While I believe that the ideological anti-gunners are about as hysterical as the gunners themselves, Collins is amusing in believing that he and other gunners are part of "a well regulated militia". Even more amusing re: Collins, is Justice Scalia's published view that the US Constitution does not necessarily ensure a "Right" for individuals to bear arms.

SM Mirror TV