Email List

To join our e-mail list, please enter your e-mail address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Shows

Sections

Classifieds

Directories

Contact

A rendering of Hines’ proposed project for the former Paper Mate site at 1681 26th Street.
Courtesy Of The City Of Santa Monica
A rendering of Hines’ proposed project for the former Paper Mate site at 1681 26th Street.

News, Development, Santa Monica

Santa Monica Coalition For A Livable City Rallies Residents To Oppose Hines Project

Posted Jan. 14, 2014, 9:21 am

Brenton Garen / Editor-in-Chief

The Santa Monica Coalition for a Livable City is rallying its members to speak up at the Jan. 28 Santa Monica City Council meeting to oppose the Hines project at 26th and Olympic (former Papermate site), which is expected to be voted on by council members.

The meeting will begin at 7 pm inside Council Chambers, located on the second floor at 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica.

In an email to its members, SMCLC said the Hines project was one of the largest development projects in Santa Monica's history in what it calls one of the most troubled traffic areas of the city.

"All of us need to come to this hearing to raise our voices and support SMCLC and community and neighborhood leaders calling for a reduced-size project - below the current 766,000 square feet of office, retail and residential," SMCLC said. "This development is way too big for this site, will have horrible traffic impacts, and lacks the community benefits and open space and other requirements specified by the Bergamot Area Plan and the City's Land Use and Circulation Element known as 'LUCE.'"

The group said many of its members had worked "mightily for several years to get Hines to downsize its project appropriately and design something we could support."

"Hines apparently believes that it has the four council votes needed to proceed with its current project regardless of the ongoing public outcry against it," the group said. "You and your neighbors may well hold the key to whether the Council will listen to residents and turn the proposed project down, or plow ahead with a project we will all regret in the years to come. We believe if this project is rejected, something better designed with fewer traffic impacts, that truly reflects Santa Monica, will be the result."

The email stated the urgency of resident participation at this Council meeting.

"If you attend no other Council meeting this year, this is the one you should come to," the email said. "Olympic Boulevard is one of the only functioning east-west streets to the Westside. If this project is allowed to add an estimated 6900 new daily vehicle trips based on the EIR that was prepared, Olympic Boulevard and the I-10 freeway access throughout the area will functionally collapse. No amount of 'community benefits' can compensate for this serious loss of mobility, which is why LUCE recognizes that not all sites in the City are appropriate for maximum development."

Post a comment

Comments

Jan. 14, 2014, 10:21:10 am

Joe said...

My advice is to move to San Clemente, it's a nice beach town like Santa Monica was. SM wants to become the Golden City.

Jan. 14, 2014, 10:33:18 am

Fred said...

To hell with Santa Monica and it's corrupt politicians who take bribes from developers. They ruined Santa Monica. It's time to move someplace nice.

Jan. 14, 2014, 3:30:15 pm

Aaron said...

Time to change the city charter to allow district (neighborhood) city council members and a city wide elected mayor. This would keep the pro-development SMRR council from dominating the agenda

Jan. 14, 2014, 8:46:51 pm

jerry6665 said...

i've watched the destruction of santa monica that has been accelerating the last few years with dismay. I'm all for development when it does not turn a lovely area into an overcrowded, gridlocked slum and that's where we're headed. it's very sad when the very thing that made santa monica a banner city for quality of life is being sold off to the highest bidder.

SM Mirror TV