Email List

To join our e-mail list, please enter your e-mail address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Shows

Sections

Classifieds

Directories

Contact

A rendering of Metropolitan Pacific Capital’s proposal for the 4th/5th Streets and Arizona development.
Courtesy Of The City Of Santa Monica
A rendering of Metropolitan Pacific Capital’s proposal for the 4th/5th Streets and Arizona development.

News, City Council, Development, Santa Monica

Metro Pacific Capital Granted Exclusive Negotiations To Develop 4th/Arizona Site

Posted Dec. 13, 2013, 8:50 am

Parimal M. Rohit / Staff Writer

Two went in, one came out. Council members unanimously selected a developer Tuesday to enter an exclusive negotiating agreement for the right to eventually build a project on City-owned property between Fourth and Fifth Streets south of Arizona Avenue.

The Santa Monica City Council selected Metro Pacific Capital to exclusively negotiate how to develop the downtown property, which is walking distance to the Third Street Promenade.

Earlier this year on Aug. 27, City staff had recommended that the City Council enter into exclusive negotiations with the Metro Pacific team based on the selection panel’s determination that their proposal best addressed the evaluation criteria and development objectives for the development site.

However, at that City Council meeting, council members instead directed staff to request additional information from two of the three applicant teams – the Metro Pacific Capital team and the Related California team – and to report back to Council in December.

It was Metro Pacific Capital’s new proposal on Tuesday that came out triumphant. Its plan calls for a 448,000-plus square foot mixed-use project, which would include a hotel, office space, residences, and retail.

According to plans, Metro Pacific Capital proposes as a 225-room hotel (127,000 square feet), 96 residential units (85,000 square feet), and a building reaching 148 feet – or 12 stories – in height. Also proposed: 172,000 square feet of office space; 52,000 square feet dedicated to retail and cultural facilities; almost 11,000 square feet for service and back of house; open space; a second-floor public terrace; ground-floor public plaza; and, public pocket parks.

By comparison, Related California proposed a 484,000-plus square foot project with more residential units. However, the proposed project did not include plans for a hotel.

Also, Metro Pacific Capital pitched 50 percent of residential units would be affordable housing. Even though Related California’s proposal featured more affordable housing units – 52 versus Metro Pacific Capital’s 48 – 80 percent of the residential units would presumably be offered at market rates.

A major factor in deciding which developer to select, City staff stated, was the number of market-rate residential units and the proposed hotel.

“The key difference in the proposed mix of uses is the Related team’s proposal to build 208 market-rate apartments and the Metro Pacific team’s proposal to build 225 hotel rooms. This difference in proposed market-rate residential use versus hotel use is one of the most significant decision points,” City staff stated.

Another difference between both projects: the amount of money each could generate for the City.

Metro Pacific Capital reported to City staff its project could produce almost $6.4 million annually in City revenues, compared to about $4.7 million by the Related California project.

The City revenue would be derived from ground lease payments, property taxes, sales tax, use tax, parking tax, business license tax, utility tax, and transient occupancy tax, among others.

Both Metro Pacific Capital and Related Capital were given guidelines to follow in creating its respective proposals.

The guidelines were: develop a programmable gathering space; provide ground-floor retail, restaurant, and cultural space; ensure the project has “a mix of uses such as retail, cultural, office, hotel and residential; be of exceptional architecture and sustainable design; have public access to views; provide at least 339 parking spaces; the approach to development should be flexible; and, the plans should incorporate concepts identified in the Downtown Specific Plan process.

Metro Pacific Capital still has quite a ways to go before entering into a development agreement (DA) with City Hall.

With the council’s decision Dec. 10, City Hall and Metro Pacific Capital will be entering into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement, or ENA.

The ENA, according to City Hall, “affirms that the City will not negotiate with any other developer for the development of the site for the duration of the ENA.”

“Entering into an ENA does not convey project approval or obligate the City to grant any entitlements. The ENA would require that the Developer make a good-faith deposit with the City and demonstrate evidence of financing prior to execution of a ground lease,” City staff stated.

During the exclusive negotiation, City officials and Metro Pacific Capital would determine the terms and conditions of the project, establish a schedule of performance, provide design concepts, and ultimately enter into a DA.

Also part of the process, if it gets that far, would be input from the public, Architectural Review Board, and the Planning Commission. The final step would be a public hearing and vote at a council meeting.

“This project would proceed in tandem with the Downtown Specific Plan process, and the two efforts would continue to be coordinated,” City staff stated. “A development agreement application would not likely be submitted until sometime in 2014 and construction would not be expected to commence until 2016.”

ICE at Santa Monica currently occupies the 112,000-square-foot City-owned property.

Post a comment

Comments

Dec. 13, 2013, 9:16:26 am

Santa Monica Tourism Board said...

Come to Santa Monica for the weird and ugly skyscrapers but stay for the traffic congestion and odor of homeless peoples' urine! As a thank you, we'll be sure to gouge you for parking and maybe give you a ticket for the privilege. It's a fine place to be a city councilor where you can get rich off of backroom deals with real estate developers while you ruin your community! Yes, Santa Monica really is a great place.

Dec. 13, 2013, 11:05:15 am

mario macera said...

I wonder how many Council Members got paid for approving this project.

Dec. 13, 2013, 1:05:55 pm

Kelli said...

You guys are RUINING Santa Monica! Traffic is already a nightmare and we have enough mixed use buildings. You guys suck! for allowing this! Residents here in Santa Monica don't want any more big buildings!

Dec. 13, 2013, 1:10:52 pm

Kelli said...

This city counsel needs to go! Get them out of office! STOP approving all this building!

Dec. 30, 2014, 10:34:42 pm

laura wilson said...

If City Council was serious about following our zoning laws they would not have approved this agreement. Both developers should have been sent back to present a maximum 84" feet hight limit. The best design that our zoning laws allow should get the contract. The City Council does not care what residents want. They care about pleasing the people who fund their campaigns.

Dec. 30, 2014, 10:35:42 pm

Laura Wilson said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJjhR0P0Uoc

SM Mirror TV