| [search_engine.html]
|

Solar Web May Be Unraveling
Carolanne Sudderth
Mirror Staff Writer
For fifteen years, the Solar Web has loomed on the horizon, waiting to cast its sun dial
shadows.
If last Thursdays meeting of the Recreation and Parks Commission was
any indication, public opinion may cast the future of the proposed structure into the
shade and off the beach, if not out of the ballpark.
Created by environmental artist Nancy Holt, the Solar Web is the latest,
largest and last of the series of sculptures on the beach that began with the singing
chairs and the giant cement roller, Art Tool.
After listening to nine speakers, the Rec and Parks commissioners voted 5 to 1 to call one
more public hearing prior to taking it to the City Council on August 17 for the official
go-ahead. The hearing will be held on August 4. The hour and venue have yet to be
determined.
Of the nine speakers, the two proponents both spoke for the Santa Monica Arts
Commission which devised the Natural Elements Sculpture Park (NES Park) and commissioned
the sculptures. Alice Fellows is now an Arts Commissioner and Bruria Finkel was an Arts
Commissioner and now holds a seat on the Rent Control Board. She has been the principal
spokesperson and advocate of NES Park from its inception.
The other seven speakers spoke against Solar Web, alleging, variously, that
the large sculpture is dangerous, a liability, vastly over budget, and has no place on the
beach.
Fellows was unfazed by the criticism.
Its in the nature of public art to cause controversy. The Solar
Web is an extraordinary and important work of art by an extraordinary and important
artist.
Bob Friday said that he loved the Solar Web but opposed the
location. Our beach is also an important piece by an important artist, he said.
Friday sits on the Board of Directors of Sea Colony One, the condominium complex directly
across the street from the proposed sculpture site.
Finkel said that the sculpture would not interfere with anyones
enjoyment of Santa Monicas most popular feature. It isnt going to
obstruct the area on the beach. Its going to enhance it.
Friday said that he didnt need to see the setting sun entangled in the Solar Web.
An open framework of black metal tubing, the Solar Web describes an area 52
feet wide and 72 feet long and steps its way up from two feet to 16 feet tall. An 8
1/2-foot circle representing the sun is held sixteen feet above the ground by upside down
Ls that rise from the ground like spiders legs, straight and vertical for 16
feet, then turning horizontal to the structures center where they become the
suns rays.
Directly below the solar circle, an 18-inch high platform mirrors the size
and shape of the circle above it. It and three four- foot concrete discs standing half out
of the sand are the slates on which sun and shadow mark the passage of time.
It tells you the time of day, equinox, solstice, and inverted eclipse
once a year. Finkel said.
She and Fellows believe that the sculpture will serve as a gateway to Santa
Monica. The seven detractors, argued that it was dangerous and an attractive
nuisance, claiming that its jungle gym-like open framework would tempt children (and
perhaps some adults)to climb on it.
Children will climb it, children will fall, and children will get
hurt. Bob Gabriel, a former council member told the commission.
His sentiments were echoed by Friday,
Some enterprising young person is going to say, That looks like a
challenge.
And I dont think this is going to have a sign on it that says,
Wear your helmet.
City staff said that the safety questions had been addressed and dealt with.
Weve met with the City Attorney and with Risk Management, and
they have determined that this is not going to be climbed, said Barbara Stinchfield,
Santa Monicas director of community and cultural affairs. The 5 1/2-inch pipes
are too large for a child to grasp.
Gabriel said that his granddaughter climbs trees with diameters much bigger
than 5 1/2 inches.
In a prepared statement, Jean Ann Holbrook wrote that the citys
Technical Look Committee had also recommended that the sharp edges of
the half circles be rounded off, and the 18-inch platform be topped with 6 inches of
neoprene rubber.
Zena Josephs, Santa Monica Malibu Unified School District didnt think
that was sufficient to prevent an accident. Pole vaulters [who vault] to16-feet land
on 4-foot [tall] inflated mattresses. Not 18 inches of neoprene.
She said that from that height, it didnt matter so much what kids
landed on as how they landed. And that a childs broken arm was worth $1 million in
liability.
A personal injury attorney, Rosario Perry said, he has dealt with the sort of
lawsuit that would result from a fall.
He labeled the Solar Web as an attractive nuisance, and said that
in those cases financial responsibility falls to the party that built it, even if
the child is trespassing. Whether or not they hit the sand is irrelevant. As a
self-insured entity, Santa Monica could be liable for $1 million before insurance kicked
in..
Perry said he wanted to go on record as stating the Solar Web is a jungle gym
Risk management says its unsafe for children, but it looks just like [a jungle
gym] and, in fact, has been represented as one for the past 10 years.
Holbrook expanded on Perrys statements with chapter and verse as she
read excerpts from city documents that supported his statements.
A staff report to City Council dated Dec. 10, 1985 stated that
works must be safe, touchable, climbable and not interfere with the view of the
ocean or the use of the beach.,
Two passages from the Local Coastal Art Plan which was approved by the
Recreation and Parks Commission in July, 1993, mandated that all sculpture
treatments will be safe and accessible.
As recently as 1996, she said, Santa Monicas Coastal Commission
application stated that the public would be allowed to climb on Solar Web (sic) like
a jungle gym,
Holbrook urged the commission not to wait until someone is hurt before
something is doe to prevent it.
Peter Davidson said that the Solar Web would become a camp city for the
homeless. Solar web is a giant tent structure. People will toss towels over it [and
make tents]. And with them, he said, will come graffiti, dogs and trash.
And theres no indication that the police will offer any
additional protection.
Commissioner Neil Carrey questioned the cost of the structure which has risen
from under $100,000 when it was originally proposed to $270,000 today. Its
very troubling for me to see this kind of money go into one art piece. Id like to go
on record that I think its wrong for this not to come back to us.
Like everything else, the price of Solar Web has risen in the past 15 years, Hamp Simmons,
an administrative analyst in Cultural Affairs, said.
According to Holbrook, the city agreed to fund three artworks in 1984, the
price of any one of which was not to exceed $22,500. Two of these, the singing chairs and
art tool, have been in place on the Santa Monica beach for some years.
Simmons said the original budget was for $75,000 in 1984, $50,000 of which
was contributed by Southmark Corporation and $25,000 of which came from the citys
Per Cent for Art fund.
Simmons said that after the earthquake, an additional $100,000 was allotted to making sure
the structure was capable of withstanding anything seismic in origin. It was
probably safe before, Simmons said, but they wanted to make it was totally
safe.
The rest of [the increase] is in the difference in what things cost. The
total cost of the structure is currently listed at $270,000, Simmons said. The Lannan
Foundation has added $75,000 to the $50,000 contributed by Southmark. The citys
share of the bill has increased from $25,000 to $145,000.
There are more cons than pros, Gabriel told the Commission.
[The price of the Solar Web] has gone [increased], and we dont know where
its going. And as a self-insured city were on the hook for at least a million
dollars.
Its not often that we get a second chance, he said.
|